[PapaBear3625]

This research indicates that there is a very significant genetic difference between the black and non-black populations.

The researchers need to watch their backs, once the non-politically-correct implications of this are thought about.

[Westbrook]

> there is a very significant genetic difference between the
> black and non-black populations.

Significant to whom?

And [God] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
Acts 17:26

So, would you not take the blood of an African descendant if you needed surgery?

Brings to mind an Archie Bunker show where he found out that the blood he received for surgery came from a Black person.

Also brings to mind the complete title for Darwin's tome.

On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
or the
Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life.

[wardaddy]

the PC Gestapo will be out

even here on Free Republic

just watch

folks here who keep up have sent me this sort of data being discovered for several years now

there are many here who think where you come from matters none...that all is conditioning

I bet no one who has more than 1 child thinks that

[allmendream]

No, this research indicates that there is a significant difference in the ANCESTRY of African and non-African populations.

The genetic difference between any two members of our species is very very small.

This reflects our rather recent common ancestry (within the last 100,000 years) and most likely a severe genetic bottleneck - where only individuals with a few variations contributed to the entirety of all subsequent generations.

Two ravens from across town most likely have far more genetic difference between them than any two human beings from across the entire planet.