Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Immerito

> Unfortunately a lawsuit would empty the purses of
> taxpayers, unless the laws in Kentucky allow individual
> officers to be sued.

If the municipality or state signing the officer’s paycheck say that he committed this act as a part of his official duty, then, yes, the governing entity’s insurance company will have to pay, and their insurance premiums will be increased accordingly.

If, on the other hand, they say that the officer acted outside of the prescribed set of actions for the situation, then the officer’s insurance will have to pay. If the officer has no insurance, everything he has that can be liquidated is on the line.


54 posted on 07/19/2011 8:31:39 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook
My understanding was that even if the police act outside their official duties, the municipality or state government is still on the hook.

They are responsible for hiring and supervising the police, so it should be on their shoulders when one goes rogue, IMO.

As for the taxpayers, they can a) swallow the tax increase and loss of services; b) move; or c) exercise proper oversight on their government so police don't go rogue.

55 posted on 07/19/2011 10:45:00 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson