Some of these jurors probably watch all the tv crime shows and think they are experts on interpreting evidence. Sure the Prosecution screwed up but it does not explain away how Caylee was missing for a month before it was reported to the police and found with with duct tape on her nose and mouth. Didn’t they bother to ask what happened? Who did this?
I know. That duct tape and missing for 31 days is pretty hard to explain; especially when the mother has admitted her daughter has been missing for 31 days. It’s a pretty good bet Casey did this since she is the one who had access to her daughter.
I immediately wonder about the intelligence of people who say they never follow the news and know nothing about cases that have been reported on for months or even years. Is it actually desirable to have people this dumb on juries?
A sad state of affairs, IMO.