Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Immerito

I just realized this is the THIRD “Police shoot dog” thread posted by you in a week, and in each one the police were not found at fault.

In the first thread, the owner of the dog actually said he understood why his dog was shoot.

In the second thread, the policeman was investigated and cleared with physical evidence.

And now this Drive-by Media hit, were SWAT is not found at fault.

That makes three strikes.


6 posted on 07/28/2011 2:54:42 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper ("Don't Call My Bluff")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Berlin_Freeper

There were people nearby when this lab is shot. Do you believe that the risk of richoched shots hitting innocent bystanders is worth dispatching a labrador?

Do you not realize that you are tacitly admitting that you find the actions of this SWAT team so indefensible that you attempt to discredit a fellow Freeper rather than defend them?


7 posted on 07/28/2011 3:03:28 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

There were people nearby when this lab is shot. Do you believe that the risk of ricocheted shots hitting innocent bystanders is worth dispatching a labrador?

Do you not realize that you are tacitly admitting that you find the actions of this SWAT team so indefensible that you attempt to discredit a fellow Freeper rather than defend them?


8 posted on 07/28/2011 3:03:45 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper
You mean that the police cleared the police of all wrongdoing! Well that settles it!

BTW, nice keywords that someone decided to put in.

16 posted on 07/28/2011 3:22:47 PM PDT by thecabal (Redeem your mind from the hockshops of authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

You a pig? Or just have a fetish?


24 posted on 07/28/2011 3:28:54 PM PDT by loungitude ( The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Just for grins, can you find a single solitary article on the internet where the police WERE found at fault for shooting a dog?


36 posted on 07/28/2011 4:26:19 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (SP12: They called Reagan "unelectable", too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

The reason the cops are not found guilty is because the ones investigating them are other cops. One only has to read most of these stories to see that the cop is not justified in shooting these dogs most of the time.


37 posted on 07/28/2011 4:36:18 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

If a public school teacher caught having sex with a minor was found “not at fault” by other school teachers, would that automatically render that teacher innocent?

How about a pedophile caught kidnapping a child, if members of NAMBLA conducted an internal investigation?

What’s that? There’s an inherent conflict of interest, you protest?

Ditto for internal investigations of cops. An outside agency needs to conduct such investigations.

When that happens, more corrupt cops will be removed, and the good cops will restore the respect of the police force by virtue of their character, impartial adherence to the law, and willingness to abide by Peelian Principles.


52 posted on 07/28/2011 8:00:40 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson