Judge Strickland was the original judge on the case, who later recused himself. According to the commentators, Strickland's original intent, when he signed her check fraud sentencing form, did not pick up on the fact that the words "ONCE RELEASED" had been left off the form...clearly a clerical error...and signed it, so Casey was set free after her criminal trial ended without serving probation on the earlier charge. So here we are today for this hearing.
The commentators are currently saying Judge Strickland has a bias against her. Judge Belvin Perry will be hearing this matter today. Don't know yet who will be arguing for Anthony, but they will be contending this order is double jeopardy.
Did anyone ever bother to notify anyone of this probable error. I am sure there are people in the probation office that would know that probation is usually served after release?