This candidate will s*ck on immigration but will do other pleasing things to keep the voters intrigued. It will merely depend on how voters feel about the issue. Are voters at the break point or not?
What’s the point in being a non-marxist if you’re open borders. No sovereignty for the U.S. is not very patriotic, in my opinion. Or am I wrong?
Perry is pro-latino. Not so bad as far as I am concerned. We need more immigration to absorb our excessive. We need to bring in quality immigrants who can help us out of our funk, as immigration has always done. US should not encourage poor uneducated latinos, but should attract the best and brightest from around the world.
Perry is pro-latino. Not so bad as far as I am concerned. We need more immigration to absorb our excessive. We need to bring in quality immigrants who can help us out of our funk, as immigration has always done. US should not encourage poor uneducated latinos, but should attract the best and brightest from around the world.
Perry is pro-latino. Not so bad as far as I am concerned. We need more immigration to absorb our excessive. We need to bring in quality immigrants who can help us out of our funk, as immigration has always done. US should not encourage poor uneducated latinos, but should attract the best and brightest from around the world.
“This candidate will s*ck on immigration but will do other pleasing things to keep the voters intrigued. It will merely depend on how voters feel about the issue. Are voters at the break point or not?”
This voter cannot choke down another open borders nominee. Perry will either have to do a mea culpa in which he unequivocatingly renounces his former views on immigration issues or I will not vote for him. Immigration is killing us as much as deficit spending (and immigration is tied into that issue).