[Venturer]

The Government already tells you what you cannot put into your body.

Can they tell you what you MUST put into your body.? Well: Michelle is doing it with kids. Are adults next.

[Ken H]

The Government already tells you what you cannot put into your body.

Do you support that? I would think your answer must be "yes".

Can they tell you what you MUST put into your body.? Well: Michelle is doing it with kids. Are adults next.

Drug War supporters don't have much of a basis to object, now do they.

[philman_36]

The Government already tells you what you cannot put into your body.
Exactly, and in many ways! Was the government granted such powers?

Can they tell you what you MUST put into your body.? Well: Michelle is doing it with kids.
How so? Isn't actual legislation, not just recommendations or suggestions, necessary for such a thing? Wouldn't the government only be operating under 'color of law' instead of under the actual law if there is no legislation? And, again, does the government even have such authority to begin with?

Are adults next.
There's no question mark so is that a question or a statement? If it is a question all you've done is avoid answering the question at all.

Yeah, and the make it all legallers, LMAO.
Yeah, and the make 'em all deaders, (not) NLMAO.
And you're a sick freak with your choice of solutions and I've got no problem telling you that you are one either.
Do you also recommend billing the family for the cost of the killing means (the poison you recommend using) like they do in China with the bullets they use for executions?

U.s. Must Co-exist With China, But It Doesn't Have To Endorse Human-rights Abuses November 27, 1996
...a single bullet to the back of the neck, with the victim's family billed for the bullet.