Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Interesting alternate energy news, especially with Condoleezza Rice joining their board.

This is a local company down the road from me (no I don't work there). They claim that their biofuel will be cost effective WITHOUT federal subsidies. And they don't use biomass from food sources. Sounds like it beats most of the pie in the sky alternate energy methods out there.

The company was founded by the guy that started SUN Microsystems, so it's not some fly by night operation. I drove by and took a look at their facilities and they are active as all heck.
1 posted on 08/25/2011 8:53:28 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: StolarStorm
They claim that their biofuel will be cost effective WITHOUT federal subsidies

Good for them. I hope it works.

2 posted on 08/25/2011 8:55:40 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

interesting.

hope it gets to market.


3 posted on 08/25/2011 8:56:53 AM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

Very encouraging post. I hope they make a fortune.


4 posted on 08/25/2011 8:58:23 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

“And they don’t use biomass from food sources.”

Wood chips? From TREES?

No, no one should object to that.


5 posted on 08/25/2011 9:02:01 AM PDT by jessduntno (Obama shanks. America tanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

I was pretty surprised that Condi joined the board. I think that speaks volumes about the real possibility that their process can work, without sucking up annual subsidies.


6 posted on 08/25/2011 9:03:46 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

The big questionis the energy cost of production.

For example, if it takes more BTU/watts. joules or whatever measure you wish to produce the consumer product, then it is a farce.

For example, it costs about 10% of a barrel of oil to produce consumer products-the 10% goes to electricity, heat, etc used from well to point of sale and the output is approx 90% useful products ranging from asphalt to gasoline and oils etc.

These “green” ideas are usually (if not always) more costly to produce than the energy they provide....

One of our algae researchers has made diesel fuel from fatty acid bearing algae-only problem is it costs about $1000 per gallon to produce, and to just manufacture enough bio-diesel to run the MODOT truck fleet, it would take every acre-foot of impounded water in the state of MO converted into algae ponds..... Realistic? NOT.


7 posted on 08/25/2011 9:04:40 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" (my spelling is generally korrect!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm
The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program provided over $1 billion in loan support for the biofuels project.

Why do I feel like this is the only reason they are into this?

9 posted on 08/25/2011 9:06:14 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm
As long as they don't need taxpayer dollars...Go For It!

I am skeptical though, I think at some point they will begin to whine and lobby for Federal Funding. We have been scammed to many times.

13 posted on 08/25/2011 9:15:56 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm

The only drawback I can see is whether or not the “biomass” crude can be co-mingled in the current delivery system of natural crude (pipelines, etc.)

If it needs a stand alone delivery system from crude production to refining, their costs will be much to high to make a real difference.

I’m guessing KiOR is developing this process to challenge Ethanol as a combustion fuel additive.

(I wish I had the money to convert my 1994 Tracker to NatGas!)


15 posted on 08/25/2011 9:20:49 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Islam is a violent and tyrannical political ideology and has nothing to do with "religion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StolarStorm
Imagine a cheaper gasoline that can be produced domestically and is environmentally friendly.

Environmentalists would do whatever it took to kill anything of the sort ASAP.

17 posted on 08/25/2011 9:28:51 AM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson