Ok. I’m betting ADA requires the bars to allow assist dogs. But if having dogs around food is a health risk, why should people be put at risk just so others can bring in their assist dogs.
And if, as I suspect, there isn’t really a health risk, why can’t everybody bring dogs in if the owner allows it?
You're expecting LAWS to be self consistent and logical?
“Ok. Im betting ADA requires the bars to allow assist dogs. But if having dogs around food is a health risk, why should people be put at risk just so others can bring in their assist dogs.
And if, as I suspect, there isnt really a health risk, why cant everybody bring dogs in if the owner allows it?”
How dare you question the Wisdom of the State!
:-)