Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

First of all,why would a pregnant woman be in space? (I’m sure this is a hypothetical question but pregnant women would not be allowed to go up in a space shuttle). Is this meant to be serious? If so, something’s really off!


70 posted on 09/25/2011 8:28:07 PM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Fear can hold you prisoner.Hope can set you free.(Shawshank Redemption))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
First of all,why would a pregnant woman be in space?

Because she singlemindedly wanted to prove how stupid it was to base a citizenship law on where a child was born. . She was a political activist bent on making a point. Does it really matter WHY she was in space?

(I’m sure this is a hypothetical question but pregnant women would not be allowed to go up in a space shuttle).

You mean for the here and now. Perhaps in the future people will vacation on the moon. Bigelow is already working to build an orbiting space hotel.

http://www.spacetourismnow.com/bigelow-sundancer.htm

Is this meant to be serious? If so, something’s really off!

It is meant to be absurd. It is a thought experiment designed to demonstrate how foolish it is to regard birth place as the determining factor for citizenship.

The child could be alternatively Russian or American depending on when it is born! :) Of course others have pointed out that we have treaties limiting the border to some specific height about the surface, but that is just an attempt to dodge the salient point. All I have to do to counter is inform them that it's a really low orbit, and within the national boundaries, etc.

71 posted on 09/26/2011 10:59:27 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson