How about this one. Restating exactly what I said.
TLI:
I have heard a lot of the interviews on her show and his was right at the bottom.
If he does that in a debate he isn't going to do well at all.
And that is exactly what happened. He did not do well.
Diverting your reasoning to commentary on the interviewer regarding their personal opinion on unrelated issues is not going to change the facts.
.
“..Diverting your reasoning to commentary on the interviewer regarding their personal opinion on unrelated issues is not going to change the facts..”
Ingraham’s views have become suspect as I noted in the post. She has an agenda and that agenda is anti Sarah Palin and apparently anti Rick Perry, so what does that mean - probably pro Myth Romney.
Attacking Sarah Palin (as well as Rick Perry is unrelated? Get real! There is NO diversion, just pointing out you are using Chris Matthews logic.
Note: if you follow the threads, you will note that I rated Rick Perry 5th in the debate.