Romney was too rigid for me. The “I have a plan” crap sucks.
Newt was the best with the answers, but we all know it’s too late for him. He should have ran in 2000 or something.
Yes, Ron Paul was good. But his kook factor is annoying.
Hunstman is a lib. A total sound bite candidate. He said “98 of 100 climate scientist agree...” and no one called him on that LIE.
Cain was okay but won’t get the nomination.
Perry was a little too statist sometimes.
If I have to choose a “winner”, I pick Perry, then Newt.
And, BTW, why didn’t Fox News have a post debate forum? I know it was on MSNBC but they had regular programming.
Figured there would at least be an after debate Hannity program.
Perry missed a great opportunity to slam Brian Williams when, after defending the death penalty in Texas, when he said, “after 237 executions their is applause. What do you say?”
Perry could have said something like “well Brian, I don’t expect some NY liberal whiner like you to understand”.
I wan’t to see a candidate take on the LSM with their stupid questions as well as explaining their position. Doesn’t hurt to give them a dig or two.