Replies

You poor thing. Maybe you should learn to say what you mean and mean what you say. It's pretty obvious to anyone reading your posts that my interpretation was spot on. Your transparent attempt to change the subject to AGW also tells me it was spot on. The fact that you refuse to defend what you wrote tells me I'm spot on.

You're not an informed consumer, you are an ignorant consumer. You fear the things you don't understand which is why you buy into the craziness offered by Natural News when it comes to the subject of vaccines. You can't differentiate between what is good for you and what is bad for you. That doesn't make you informed. No, it's something much worse.

...Your transparent attempt to change the subject to AGW also tells me it was spot on. The fact that you refuse to defend what you wrote tells me I'm spot on....

I said exactly what I meant and have no problem defending it.

And despite any insults from you I will not defend something I did not say.

...Your transparent attempt to change the subject to AGW also tells me it was spot on. ...

I have to admire your tenacity in defending the CDC, FDA, and EPA who have signed on to man-made global warming and adjusted their policies accordingly. This is extremely relevant because it is a big sign that politics and the 'science of consensus' have overtaken reason and the scientific method at these three agencies. A recent example is what passed for science in the mandated switch from CFC inhalers to inferior HFA inhalers in order to 'save' the ozone hole and prevent an epidemic of melanoma. ;)