Posted on 11/01/2011 2:12:41 PM PDT by JDW11235
I think you are rather loony on this issue, as well as several others.
Your logic seems to be that if I say there is no reason for an advanced and intricate conspiracy to do A B or C because it is ALREADY BEING DONE, more easily and more cheaply, via a different and already existing mechanism - that I somehow have no problem with A B and C - in fact I support it - and that by logically pointing out the REAL danger - I am somehow diminishing the importance of the danger.
Does that make sense to you? It sure doesn’t make any sense to me.
But then again logical and rational thinking has never been the hallmarks of your posts.
By the time the Antichrist comes on the scene, the entire world will be comfortable with getting some type of mechanism on the body, whether it is a chip or a tattoo, to buy and sell, and only those who have accepted Christ as Savior and know what taking one of these things really means will refuse to do so.
This is already well underway and the conditioning has made great progress.
Say there was an article saying there was a CIA plot to put listening devices into every home in America - they were (according to the conspiracy theorists) sneaking in at night and planting them.
Say that I pointed out that the CIA can listen in on any phone in your house, even when it is “off”. Any receiver can be remotely activated such that they can listen in almost anywhere they want anytime they want.
Would me pointing this out make you think I was FOR the CIA listening in on every American home?
Do you think me knowing of this possibility of activating a phone receiver would make me request that the CIA sneak into my home and plant listening devices because I don't think it is an issue?
Or would you conclude that I don't think the conspiracy is plausible or even necessary - because the CIA can already listen in on just about any conversation taking place anywhere within hearing distance of a phone?
More gaseous emissions. That TROLL on your forehead is flashing ever faster. Your question is answered in my post. Reading comprehension is your friend only if you are not a Troll.
You’re one of the biggest supporters of nanny-state control I’ve seen on FR, all in the name of science and technology, of course.
Your position on this topic is no surprise.
So go ahead, take the chip and let us know how it works out for you. and don’t forget the BBQ sauce. You’re going to need it.
Way to absolutely NOT deal with the argument I made.
Just because I point out that there is no reason to go through such amazing Herculean efforts to do something that is already easily done doesn't imply that I am FOR what is being done.
Can you follow that line of reasoning or should I explain it to you again, using smaller words, maybe use simpler examples?
Would that help you?
I always wonder how this chip is supposed to work after it’s been shoved up the rectum of the person who tries to implant one in me.
Yeah, Well it’s YOUR posting history.
Shall we start with public education and teaching creation in schools?
Or mandatory vaccines?
Seems that you are a nanny stater in that you want the government to provide religious instruction.
I am against public education and for vouchers/ private school.
Vaccinations should be mandatory for attendance in public schools, as well as the policy for any private school I would send a child to.
But good luck going with the Jenny McCarthy crowd of anti science idiots! When preventable diseases like polio start to make a comeback and strikes the children of such idiots it will not be unexpected.
“Amd’s knee jerk reaction to anyone who disagrees with him is to portray himself as a objective, reasonable intellectual elite over whom we should all gasp in wonder and awe at his intellectual prowess.”
Agreed. When you’re best attempt to desensitize everyone to a growing evil attempt at total population control is to say they’re “whacko” and then go on to mention a PROVEM means by which they are already spied on, is a bit of an “idiot moment.”
Some of them are so small they are really nothing more than powder (like those produced by Hitachi:
http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=939
But I encourage you to make that placement, all the same. Maybe they’ll stop trying. :-)
“Teaching religion in public schools is giving the government a power not provided under our Constitution.”
TEACHING IS NOT a power given to government under our Constitution. 1st Amendment says that the FEDERAL Government (Congress shall...) cannot make laws regarding the expression of Religion, not that states cities, whatever cannot. Some state have state religions (IIRC Mass being one of them).
I am doubtful that many people could willfully cut down into their fat layer (human preservation instinct is hard to overcome), but I think you’re right, that would be easiest. Hey, maybe THAT’s what friends are for.
I’ve known some old boys who dug out their own abcessed teeth and the roots rather than go to the dentist. I’m pretty sure such home dentistry involved some serious self-medicating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.