Posted on 11/02/2011 10:07:58 AM PDT by Yaelle
I likey.
Well according tot he democrats during the Clinton years...it was only sex...so to me who cares it was only sex....so...
yah - twwitter bugs me too, lots of garbage there, but lots of potential there too for getting the message out and shaping the dialogue...
With this caveat: of course we have to first evaluate whatever negative information is brought up about our candidates. If, having done so in a reasonable (non-Jerry Springer celebrity-crime mentality frenzy) way, a person concludes that the incident does not impugn the candidate’s character or conduct, THEN the response from there on out should be exactly as you say:
Theoretically, this is best. However, I don’t see anyone but mitt left as our potential nominee. If we even stop to consider whatever it is they throw at Herman, we have Mitt.
Seriously, what could even be such a deal breaker in Cain’s past that would make Obama a better choice? That’s why I am more radical. Just say “So” no matter WHAT they throw at us! They want us off message and “carefully examining evidence.”.
So, publicly, we should all but ignore the charges. We don’t have another option.
Great idea!
I agree. And when you send a little concise salvo out there that is a bit more informed or thoughtful than some of that crap, people seem to like it. So let’s do it. Fight the ignorant on twitter.
Not only ‘so’, but who cares - if it takes a week to get the details - we’re still waiting - then it can’t be much of a scandal. Every time they attack Cain, send him money.
The accusers just named another woman against Cain. So I just donated again.
If cain propositioned women, he’s still better than Romney or Obama! So I say
SO???
IOW, she can claim anything she wants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.