It may be a vanity, but the “Just Say “So?” campaign is important to control the story as they come after Cain. For your list.
Sure they have the big guns, since they control traditional media, but the Brits had the big guns too and we cleaned their clock through creative guerrilla warfare
This battle will be won if we fight smart and take to the jungles of Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube.
I am not saying Newt and Perry are out. But if they were the front runners, the media would be after them the same. It is time for conservatives to contest the whole story, rather than constantly falling for the media’s “When did you stop beating your wife?” tactics.
Rush is all over this. He’s mad and disguested.
GO RUSH!
There are WAY worse stories about all the Demorats....zero and Clinton are the worst!!!! and the MSM is silent.
My rule—if the MSM is outraged, I embrace whomever they are truly outraged at, because cockroaches can NEVER stand the light and truth, so will try to take anyone down—and there is no perfect person on earth. FBI files were combed by Hillary decades ago and she should be in prison.....but silence.......by MSM.
All I know is that Cain is WAY closer to perfect and a Capitalist, than the Satanist/Marxists zero and clinton, who both worship on the altar of Baal and have sold their souls to the Devil.
SEVERENCE PAY.
Not a settlement for any sexual harrassment.
Exactly right. Every time Cain’s group calls, it’s $10-$20.
Exactly. Democrats and the media try to control the issue to their advantage. Remember "move on" when Clinton was caught with his pants down in the White house? Remember how he can "compartmentalize" so it won't affect his job? Remember the woman's rights activist saying that "the greater good" or "the big picture" is what we should be concerned with?
And all of that was for something that actually happened.
With Cain we are hearing about some vague allegations which happened over twenty years ago and are disputed. It clearly isn't important and you can bet that the democrats are only concerned with their "big picture".
Great idea. How about a twitter hashtag:
#So?
As a single line response to indicate we’re not playing the media games anymore.
With this caveat: of course we have to first evaluate whatever negative information is brought up about our candidates. If, having done so in a reasonable (non-Jerry Springer celebrity-crime mentality frenzy) way, a person concludes that the incident does not impugn the candidate's character or conduct, THEN the response from there on out should be exactly as you say:
SO.
The less we talk about this and try to call out the LSM or blame someone for bringing up stuff that actually happened, the more we are cooperating in actings as PROPS in the LEFT'S DESTRUCTIVE POLITICAL THEATER.
A lively debate on just this same idea is here:
Hermain Cain is Reckless and Arrogant. (Do yourself a favor and skip the vanity post that started it all. Go straight to the comments.)
Well according tot he democrats during the Clinton years...it was only sex...so to me who cares it was only sex....so...