I'll say it again - "Women's Lib" has not liberated women. It has liberated men from their responsibilities to women. It has also removed their sense of shame.
this man has 3 children; his blood, his heirs, his name - being bitten by bedbugs, nearly homeless, and entrusted to the kindness of strangers - and he's nowhere to be seen. SHAME!
>”this man has 3 children; his blood, his heirs, his name - being bitten by bedbugs, nearly homeless, and entrusted to the kindness of strangers - and he’s nowhere to be seen. SHAME!”<
That is exactly the point, THERE IS NO SHAME.
Responsibility to the Family, who needs it? Getting Welfare Checks for sitting on your butt, no problem. Standing in line at the Supermarket using your EBT (or whatever they call it) Card knowing the people waiting behind you are paying for your food, screw em.
This is the reality of America. Get what you can without working for it all the while knowing that the Politicos will never have the guts to take it all away.
Who are the suckers? We all know it’s us.
Maybe. The article says she has a good relationship with her ex-husband. But that does not mean that he is even able to help take care of the kids. He might be near homelessness himself in this economy; he might have health problems; who knows? I’m familiar with two situations in which devoted, loving, responsible fathers were for awhile completely unable to help provide for their children due to situations beyond their control. Even as a divorced woman, I do not necessarily conclude that the father has always abdicated his responsibility.
Naturally, if he really has walked away from his responsibilities, I agree he should be dragged through the mud, tarred, feathered, and compelled to help the kids.