He went to the demo and overlooked the fact this sucker was built out of what appears to be something little changed from a brand new "towable" 1Mwh line battery that (thanks to new tech) can last 5.5 hours ~ and he distracts us by claiming Rossi should have run it 8 hours to prove there was no "chemical reaction".
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!
I hope you don't think the NASA guy understood what he was looking at.
Some of our most ardent "it's a scam" folks ALSO laugh at the idea this could just be a large battery (of a type they clearly do not understand). They want us to measure the possible flow of hot water, or secret heating wires, or hot plates, or the effect of a power generator in the vicinity and just pass right past the fact this"battery" could, in fact, be a "battery"!
And you do, really?