Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: simplesimon

Thanks!

It pains me that the military bends over to allow queers to serve but can’t do anything for a normal all American kid who loves his country.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 6:22:35 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TSgt

You might want to post this on the Oprah forums - you’ll find more sympathy there.

It is laudable that he wants to serve, bu there is no right to be a soldier.

I agree that it is disgusting to bend over for the homos, but you are advocating for no standards at all now that homos are in. In fact when women were allowed in the same thing happened: standards dropped for all manner of things in the services.

It is part of the leftisit agenda: destroy western culture. Western culture holds out soldiers as brave patriots and warriors. They got girls in first, which allowed servicemen to be a bit more sissified. Then it made sense that full blown homos could serve because standards dropped. Now you are falling into the trap: “if homos can serve there must not be any standards, so my nephew with health problems should also be able to serve.”

I also raised my eyebrow when I saw you seem to whine about his benefits being cut - it is a sad day when we define a new recruit who had a bad reaction to his shots as a “disabled vet” and we give him lifetime benefits. What am I missing?


19 posted on 12/20/2011 7:12:19 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson