Of course, the article follows the usual rules of not calling him a Democrat, leaving one free to assume he was a Republican on a bipartisan commission. The only way to be sure he is a Democrat is that his affiliation is not named.
“..Of course, the article follows the usual rules of not calling him a Democrat, leaving one free to assume he was a Republican on a bipartisan commission. The only way to be sure he is a Democrat is that his affiliation is not named...”
:::::::::::
True — and I always verify what is probably correct in Wikipedia which usually gives their party affiliation and some background to discloses these cockroaches.