Skip to comments.
World awaits crash of failed Russian Mars probe [Sunday or Monday]
msnbc ^
| 1/13/2012 12:33:38 PM ET 2012-01-13T17:33:38
| Leonard David
Posted on 01/13/2012 6:55:58 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: BenLurkin
We had one come down in 2008 and it missed my head so I had to vote.
I hope this one finds the target.
21
posted on
01/13/2012 8:28:40 PM PST
by
MaxMax
To: DuncanWaring
We “know” to get to Mars we leave earth and move “out”. But where would we go if we started at the North Pole and went straight “up”? Or if we started at the South Pole and went straight “down”? And what does it look like?
To: JRandomFreeper
Face it... Going to Mars is freaking HARD. It's nearly a miracle that we have been able to do it. Really awesome.
To: hatfieldmccoy
Alice Gorman, a lecturer in the School of Humanities, Department of Archaeology, at Flinders University in South Australia.
The best spokesperson on orbital re-entry physics those shrunken heads at MSNBC could find is a shrunken head expert.
24
posted on
01/13/2012 8:35:18 PM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
25
posted on
01/13/2012 8:41:19 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Happy Friday the 13th, everyone!)
To: SunkenCiv
Shit. Why didn’t I get the memo BEFORE???
To: BenLurkin
The fuel is reported to be hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide, So, wasn't the chance of toxic hydrazine coming down the reason we shot down our errant satellite back in '08??? At first blush it would seem someone is lying. I mean, was the hydrazine really a danger then? Or are they downplaying the danger now?
The only explanation that comes to mind is that our satellite was "dead" and the heaters had shut down and the hydrazine had frozen. Maybe this bird is still semi-alive and the hydrazine is in liquid form and thus more likely to dissipate rather than crash land?
27
posted on
01/13/2012 8:50:50 PM PST
by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: ThunderSleeps
What’s the chances of it flaming out? That would put on a good show.
To: WSGilcrest
That would be neat. I've seen a couple of big (relatively, but who knows?) meteors burn up on re-entry. One to the point of leaving a visible smoke trail. Really cool.
Hey, how about that as a really avante garde, expensive art form? Trying various chemicals/compounds/states at re-entry... I'd rather the NEA fund that than some idiot putting a cross in urine...
29
posted on
01/13/2012 10:34:38 PM PST
by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Terry Mross
30
posted on
01/13/2012 11:16:50 PM PST
by
Dryman
(Define Natural Born Citizen)
To: BenLurkin; All
To: Terry Mross
I’m thinking there are a lot of possible answers, depending on your velocity leaving the pole.
32
posted on
01/14/2012 11:47:57 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: BenLurkin
Grunt!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson