"Right now, due to the large number of uncertainties in the orbit and space environment affecting the satellite, the indications are that Phobos-Grunt could re-enter between January 13-17, between 51.4 degrees north and 51.4 degrees south," Klinkrad said in a recent ESA statement.
1 posted on
01/13/2012 6:56:05 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: KevinDavis
Russian Federal Space Agency The failed Russian Mars probe Phobos-Grunt is predicted to crash back to Earth between in the next few days. The spacecraft will fall between 51.4 degrees north latitude and 51.4 degrees south latitude, as shown in the diagram.
2 posted on
01/13/2012 6:57:18 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
What are the chances it falls on the White House?
3 posted on
01/13/2012 7:02:36 PM PST by
Drew68
To: BenLurkin
Maybe it could fall on the Mitt Romney campaign bus.
6 posted on
01/13/2012 7:09:55 PM PST by
Drew68
To: BenLurkin
Mars seems to hate Russia. They hit a hole-in-one on the Venus probe.
But they have had horrible luck with Mars.
Not that our is that good.
Face it... Going to Mars is freaking HARD.
/johnny
To: BenLurkin
It’s only 2-1/2 tons of nearly indestructible metal hurtling uncontrollably into the Earth.
What could possibly go wrong?
9 posted on
01/13/2012 7:20:20 PM PST by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: BenLurkin
Phobos-Grunt was identified to be no high-risk object,”
The risk is elevated if it falls on you!
16 posted on
01/13/2012 7:49:07 PM PST by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: BenLurkin
What a moronic, overwrought, vapid headline from MSNBC..hey things haven’t changed on the never watched channel... Jeez I don’t think I’ll be joining “the World” in waiting for the space junk to vaporize. God this mindless sh*t wears me out.
18 posted on
01/13/2012 8:02:46 PM PST by
hatfieldmccoy
(It's not racism..... it's probability, actuarial tables, statistics. Facts are stubborn things.)
To: BenLurkin
I'm ready
20 posted on
01/13/2012 8:26:02 PM PST by
stylin19a
(obama - "FREDO" smart)
To: BenLurkin
We had one come down in 2008 and it missed my head so I had to vote.
I hope this one finds the target.
21 posted on
01/13/2012 8:28:40 PM PST by
MaxMax
To: BenLurkin
The fuel is reported to be hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide, So, wasn't the chance of toxic hydrazine coming down the reason we shot down our errant satellite back in '08??? At first blush it would seem someone is lying. I mean, was the hydrazine really a danger then? Or are they downplaying the danger now?
The only explanation that comes to mind is that our satellite was "dead" and the heaters had shut down and the hydrazine had frozen. Maybe this bird is still semi-alive and the hydrazine is in liquid form and thus more likely to dissipate rather than crash land?
27 posted on
01/13/2012 8:50:50 PM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: BenLurkin; All
To: BenLurkin
Grunt!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson