Skip to comments.Ann Coulter Made a Fool of Herself on Sunday Fox and Friends (VANITY)
Posted on 01/22/2012 7:43:45 AM PST by mitchell001
On this Sunday's Morning's Fox and Friends, Ann Coulter continues her Kamakazi mission for Mitt Romney. She continues burning her bridges to the possibility of eventually supporting Newt Gingrich for President. When a smart person does not acknowledge Gingrich's shining victory in South Carolina and criticizes the people of South Carolina by saying they were becoming like Democrats again, Ann is acting like a doctrinaire Liberal who does not acknowledge the success of their political opponents. Ann is risking her credibility and seems prepared to go down with Mitt Romney.
Although Ann Coulter used to make me laugh with some of her outrageous statements, I always considered her to be a superficial lightweight which is why I never bought one of her books.
Nope, never did like Ann Coulter. Bought her books but even then thought she was just a conservative in name only. Always had the thought she might be some kind of druggie. Sort of the same with Glenn Beck - never have thought he was on solid footing, so to speak. And as for Ron Paul, never a fan of him. As a Texan, I know his history and he is a long time goof ball in my estimation and would not be a congressman in most areas of Texas. Houston has a large area of liberals which is what Ron Paul essentially is. And I have not listened to Sean Hannity after realizing he is not a true conservative.
very happy for you
same here ref Hannity.
He has never talked about conservative social issues, he admitted he does not care who marries who and when the don’t ask policy was going to be overturned I and other vets and still those serving tried a lot to call him seeing as he keeps saying he is pro military and for the troops.
We called and called and the screener did not let us get through instead saying they were not talking about that today.
One vet did get through by lying and once he got on tot Hannity and brought up the subject the line went dead and Hannity said we seem to have lost the caller.
Then his usual boring crap of how he tries to hard to make himself look like a hard working blue collar worker became tedious, he thinks because he worked on a construction site for a couple of weeks as a kid makes him hard working .
Then there is his boring usual establishment guests and the usual liberals he has on is just pure boring.
Hannity gets no money from me anymore, he is a fraud fooling some and his concerts is a place I will not go to at all.
wow you must be seeing as you said it twice
Ann doesn’t need us? We don’t need her. End of story.
And Bush Sr lost his second term, too.
“I always considered her to be a superficial lightweight which is why I never bought one of her books.”
I guess I can say it now, but never have before out of respect; but watching some of the crusty olds here slobber and drool like teenyboppers over this bag of bones the past 10 years kind of made me ill.
How is that not true?
And at the same time, with Newt Gingrich you get the name calling for the president very popular with the tea party crowd and South Carolina, not so popular with independents. He wont put a fence on the border but wants amnesty for illegals. He took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac. But you know, he attacked Paul Ryans plan on Social Security. So with Newt Gingrich, you throw out the baby and keep the bath water."
Where is it wrong? I'm not asking "What can you feel offended about or pick a fight over if you really want to?" And leave Romney out of it for a minute. Where's the mistake in her facts or logic?
I have to agree with you there. Her first books I thought were well researched and made good arguments. Not buying anymore of her stuff though.
Something heppened with her sometime during the GWBush second term. She changed, not the Conservatives who had long appreciated her. and who now often scratch their heads upon hearing some new position she’s taking.
Annie Rexia looks like a skeleton with a blonde wig.
Doesn’t that woman ever eat?
It doesn’t end with -able but “malnourished” also fits.
Those knees look they could stab a guy to death.
Life is good.
The problem though is what happens if your target demographic makes a decision to support someone you don't like (the SC/Newt even that drove a wooden stake into the hearts of many RINOs)? Suddenly you lash out in a manner that makes the target demographic realize she was a RINO all along.
Which is why it is not at all shocking why people like Coulter and Beck (not to mention the likes of O'Reilly) act the way they do. It is a business to them. A very lucrative business. It is only that now it seems the target demographic is taking actions that are not 'prequalified' by the RINO elites.
The occutards are right about one thing - their impression of north eastern elite republicans. They are scum. They are as much chrony capitalists (ie. thieves) as the worst of the democrats.
They have GOT to be marginalized. Starting with Noonan, Parker, and expecially Coulter.
Surely when you cite “Parker” you’re not referring to Star Parker, are you? I’ve never read or heard anything from her that would lead me to question her conservative credentials.
I don’t know why FOX keeps adding the “turnoff people” (people who make me change the channel as soon as they appear), but Coulter joins the list of Juan Williams, Haraldo Rivera, Carl Rove, and others who have all jumped on the RINOwagon.
Juan Williams and Geraldo Rivera have always been staunch liberal Democrats. Therefore, they don’t fit the definition of a RINO (Republican In Name Only).
No, there is a bimbo called Kathleen Parker. She’s a total ditz but is counted as conservative.
We made her, we can break her.
“Ann is risking her credibility and seems prepared to go down with Mitt Romney.”
Ann “If Mitt Romney is our candidate we LOSE” Coulter has no credibility.
She is finally being recognized as the phony she is.
I used to get flamed for telling the truth about Ann Coulter.
Now i’m in the “99%” who are on to her phoniness.
And as well; Karl Rove, Dana Perino and too many more, at Fox News. . .
And yes, Ann; in so viciously attacking 'personally' those who support Newt; and imagining that 'Established' Repub Wisdom; is just that; has put herself. . .over the top; and insanely; unwisely so.
And put me in the position of turning off Fox News; whenever she appears.
The Freepers have not changed.
Oh, clearly; the theme has changed. Coulter's targets have changed. If they had not; this thread would be empty.
She definitely defies the ‘Fox News Female Image’. . .Never heard of her - before Fox News.
I had seen her but never took her name until now.
She looks like that pep boys AD with the bobbing heads as she does just that but with her pulling her ugly face
No just what they say.
Which makes the irony even richer when she said SC voters chose to vote for snotty comments directed at the media instead of "who can beat Obama in Nov."
FReepers have not changed what they said, she has changed what she claimed to believe and Freepers are responding to that. I know this may to be much for a liberal, like yourself, to comprehend but I’m sure if you tried really hard it’ll get through your thick skull. Then again, maybe not.
yea it sure loves to double post
If Ann really believes that Mitt is the one to beat Obama, then I must conclude that her brain has been damaged by the constant bleaching of her hair.
I am concerned, however, that Ann and all the other Mitt-supporters in the media who say that Newt can't win in November will do everything in their power to make it a self-fulfilling prophesy.
Well yeah, they used to say they liked her, now they don’t like her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.