Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MichaelCorleone
Not a lawyer, but husband is. The subpoena to appear was challenged by BHO’s Georgia lawyer, but his motion to quash was very poorly written. So the administrative law judge denied the motion to quash, but wrote the reason was because he cited no legal precedent or applicable law supporting his motion. Hubby says it looks like it was written by a first year law student, and offended the judge.
So! He expects the lawyer to rewrite the motion correctly and resubmit it on Monday. Or they could just show up with the requested documents. Either way, the judge would take some time to rule, so the 1/26 date is likely to be changed.
No reason to be rude about it- not everyone has an in house legal opinion on call.
67 posted on 01/22/2012 10:06:50 PM PST by Goldwater Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Goldwater Girl

Thank you, ma’am.


88 posted on 01/22/2012 10:44:08 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Goldwater Girl

You’re husband is very bright.

That is exctly what’s going to happen.

I wonder why everyone immediatly gets hostile and rude when you try to point out the facts.


150 posted on 01/23/2012 2:14:19 PM PST by Scouts Honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson