Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SWAMPSNIPER

The Judge allowed Plaintiffs to enter Obama’s COLB and long form BC as certified and valid documents of his birth record.

He disallowed Obama’s Indonesian school record to be entered.

Obama has to be found qualified to be on the ballot with this evidence.


43 posted on 01/26/2012 9:22:23 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (PSALMS 37:28 For the LORD loves justice and does not abandon the faithful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen

I disagree, Sven. Just because the COLB or LFBC were admitted into evidence doesn’t follow that he’s automatically qualified. The issue is that Obama Sr. was a British citizen, evidenced on the BC and admitted to by NObama himself...thus NObama is not natural-born.

Having said that, I had a thought last night that was mentioned upthread here, and on another thread. NObama may very well be deemed ineligible here in Georgia. It is the logical way to decide this case, based on precedent case law. However the DOJ will file suit based on “disenfranchisement”. IMO that’s the only way NObama can play this. “If you deny me access to the ballot, you are denying voters the right to vote for the candidate of their choosing.”


58 posted on 01/26/2012 10:05:09 AM PST by melissa_in_ga (Laz would hit it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: SvenMagnussen; Obama Exposer; Red Steel

Sven, are you going to make this comment all over FR today? What you are saying doesn’t make a lick of sense to me.


61 posted on 01/26/2012 10:09:21 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: SvenMagnussen

The first plaintiff was not arguing where he was born but his status as a NBC. The second plaintiff introduced expert testimony that the copy of the birth certificate released was a fraud. Obama failed to provide any rebuttal to this testimony. if the judge rules in favor of the second plaintiff, he would be ruling that the copy submitted in the first case was fraudulent. That’s how I see it but I am not a lawyer.


68 posted on 01/26/2012 10:26:53 AM PST by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson