Posted on 01/26/2012 9:08:09 PM PST by OUTKAST
Over one million hits - Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers )
“it clearly is a fake”—video uploader. Funny how Google hasn’t banned him yet.
“Why didn’t Obama submit his paper Long Form Birth Certificate in Georgia this morning? Seems like it would have been cheap and simple to do.”
How so, if he does not have one?
Document experts seem to be unanimous in their opinion
that the alleged and recently issued BC is a fake.
Besides that, I think the Georgia claim is that his father
was not a citizen.
I am still confused on that issue.
I hear many say that both parents MUST be US citizens, and the Obots claim that parental citizenship means nothing.
Is there a definitive law about this?
I thought I knew all this from before, but dang if I haven’t sat here and watched all four videos. He’s very good and obviously convincing beyond any doubt that as we already knew, the BC is a FAKE.
All that zooming in and out makes me want a Mac ;-)
1M hits and the SOB still sleeps in the WH. God help us.
At least Ron Pollard gets to make money off this constitutional debacle.
It sounds pretty convincing to me.
ping
“Why didn’t Obama submit his paper Long Form Birth Certificate in Georgia this morning?”
I was wondering the same thing.
Being that he is a legal, natural born citizen which is one of the main Requirements of being POTUS and all.
I wonder what the hold up is?
Aside from the issue that mr. fairshare mysteriously can’t find his long lost birth certificate. The fact is his father is not a citizen and the law say’s if either of your natural parents are not a natural born citizen of the United States you cannot run for much less be the potus!I heard this on Quinn and Rose.
The only thing natural about mr. fairshare is that he’s a natural born liar!!
John Bingham, considered by many as the father of the 14th Amendment defined a natural born Citizen as this:
“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))
As we all know now confirmed in the Fight The Smears admission, Obama's father's owed loyalty to a foreign sovereignty, the United Kingdom.
The last two sentences in this paragraph below from candidate Obama's campaign website 'Fight The Smears' more that confirmed that Barack Obama Jr. was not a natural born Citizen and the admission was hidden in plain view.
" When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children."
The Constitution was adopted only a few years after the U.S. signed a treaty with Great Britain that preserved British citizenship rights for persons born in the United States and their children who wished to retain British citizenship. There’s no way they would have considered natural-born citizenship to only mean “born in the United States” because it would have allowed British subjects to become president.
Second, this proposition was an either/or proposition. You were either a British subject or a natural-born citizen of the United States, not a combination of both.
Third, if it only required birth on U.S. soil to be a U.S. citizen, then there would have been no need for the 14th amendment several decades later. The Supreme Court acknowledged that the 14th amendment did not define nor redefine natural-born citizenship by saying it excluded the children born in the country to citizen parents.
Now, the Georgia judge probably does have a copy of that (fake) Birth Certificate that Obama produced suddenly this year. However, it clearly states that Obama, Sr. was his father. So, either Obama declares that the BC is a fraud, and that Obama, Sr. is NOT his dad, and names some other U.S. citizen as his father, thereby causing more confusion about his parentage...or he holds steadfast on the BC with Obama, Sr. listed. Either way, Barack Obama is in a trap that he and his supporters have created.
The sad thing about all of this is how confused his children must be.
Obama used to refer to Kenya as his home. When he won the election for Senator in Illinois, the Chicago paper there made a big point of calling him a "Kenyan." In Kenya they continually point to the fact that they are proud that Kenyan has become President of the U.S. Michelle claimed Kenya was his home in one speech she gave here, and another time when she was in Kenya and said Obama was glad to be home. Now these kids must have seen or heard some of this and wonder, where was Daddy born, where was his home first - Hawaii or Kenya...who is his father/our grandfather...what is our real heritage...and why did Daddy and Mommy change their story?
BTTT
There are supreme court cases that define natural born citizen as one born on US soil to 2 US citizen parents.
The historic correspondance from our founding fathers define nbc as one borned subject to the country’s jurisdiction, i.e. not subject to any other jurisdiction = no divided loyalty.
A person born to 2 US citizen parents on US soil is naturally born with sole allegiance to USA, hence he/she is a natural born citizen.
A person born to one foreign parent has allegiance to that parent’s country.
A person born on foreign soil has allegiance to that country.
It is ‘divided loyalty’ that the founding fathers want to avoid.
In 2007, Obama himself ‘resolved’ in Resolution 511 that McCain, being born to 2 USA citizen parents, is a ‘natural born citizen’ constitutionally eligible to be the pres!
Then he claims himslef nbc even though he was born to a foreign father!
Learn more about it at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Mke that one million and one
The law is the Constitution, which is in part founded on natural law, which relied on definitions codified by Vattel. The most succinct, undisputed SCOTUS case affirming this is Minor v. Happersett.
Both these clearly affirm the two-citizen parent requirement to be a natural born citizen. The parents need not be natural born, however, but they must be citizens at the time of their child’s birth to make that child natural born.
HF
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.