Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio

Under the left’s plan, how would they have liked this scenario:

Gore wins 49 states with a 50,000 vote margin in each one, Bush wins Texas with a 3,000,000 vote margin. Bush wins!

That’s one reason we have an electoral college.


7 posted on 02/03/2012 6:46:09 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58

Exactly.
The idea of the EC is to give a bit more power and say to the smaller states. Otherwise, the candidates would just campaign in the states with high EC votes, right? A candidate can
win with a coalition of small states—or more likely one with some big states and a whole lot of small ones. “Flyover
country”

In some elections it looked like the Northeast/East and California/West Coast went solid Dem. These “red states”
were often scoffed at as “flyover country”. What was interesting was a county by county map of the U.S. In
2000 it was a sea of red with some blue splotches.

In my song parody of “Massachusetts” (Bee Gees) about the 04 election, I wrote:
(Kerry) Got a lot of votes in San Francisco
New York and L.A., they loved you too
But you’re still going back to Massachusetts
The Swift Boat hero, left Democrats so blue.

I have brought up your argument before: it could backfire
on the Dems in the way you say.


12 posted on 02/03/2012 6:53:45 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson