[philman_36]

Now we know that the judge made no error.
I know no such thing.

That in fact there are inconsistencies in how portions of the Constitution are labeled.
Where?

There are Birther lawyers that agree with the Arkney (sic) judge.
The ONE lawyer that you've used as an example can be just as wrong as the Ankney judge and you've provided no evidence whatsoever, as of yet, to back up your claim about Indiana.

There are other states that use the same wording.
Where? The @NH example you gave doesn't apply as it doesn't even have any mention whatsoever of any Article, Section or Clause.

[Harlan1196]

Check your eyes:

“I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution”