Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL

My “gripe” is that you state matter-of-factly that Rush is trying to restore his “credibility”. The inference is that he lost his credibility somehow. If that’s your opinion, why don’t you articulate where you came up with that lame idea?


85 posted on 02/29/2012 9:42:17 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard

“The inference is that he lost his credibility somehow. If that’s your opinion, why don’t you articulate where you came up with that lame idea?”........i, too, am all ears.


91 posted on 02/29/2012 10:03:45 PM PST by stickywillie (a corrupt parallel universe exists beside our wonderful Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard

Please see my post #88—Lancey. If that’s unsatisfactory or insufficient as an articulation, I’ll be happy to further elaborate.

Geeez, all you had to do was ask. Gosh, you ditto-heads are touchy.


92 posted on 02/29/2012 10:06:23 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard

I have to agree. Rush certainly has lost a lot of “credibility” with me. It’s not that I’m mad that he hasn’t endorsed a candidate, it’s that I’m mad he wasn’t ontop of the Newt smears on bloody Thursday. Other people did the hard work of fighting that, while our “leader” Rush Limbaugh provided commentary, and not very good commentary at that.


93 posted on 02/29/2012 10:09:05 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson