Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Kodak was fat, dumb and happy for a long time. I was a photo hobbyist in 1975, doing darkroom work and taking tons of photos. I thought I was on top of all the developments in the photography market, but I cannot recall any publicity for the 1975 development of the first digital camera. I know they made the decision to keep quiet about it out of a desire not to cannibalize their film sales - but come on, at some point you develop it as an applied technology in parallel to film-based photography, if only to have a head-start when the shift happened. I guess that didn’t occur to them. Doh!


8 posted on 03/01/2012 6:49:55 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wally_Kalbacken

I’m not sure how much actual input had in the design of recent cameras, other than some gimmicks like “Easy Share”. I heard a lot of their products were made by Seagull, O.K., but not an actual Kodak factory.


11 posted on 03/01/2012 7:43:56 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson