[Lady Jag]

Laws are like sausages; you know the rest. Laws are structured to control the little people and many of them aren't legal. So, no, Breitbart could no have been murdered legally.

He may have died naturally BUT it is highly doubtful for two reasons:

1) The natural causes determination came out ridiculously fast.

2) All celebrity autopsies are complete and reported within 24 hours. The report is either the final determination or that toxicology reports have to come back before determination.

They've learned a lot since Vince Foster, just not enough.

[butterdezillion]

What would make it illegal? If targeted assassinations are legal, and only the POTUS can decide which citizens are “enemies”, then what would prevent a POTUS from legally assassinating whoever he wanted?

Or are you saying that targeted assassinations are NOT legal, and that the courts would rule that way if a case was before them?

If they are not legal, what current law forbids them, and what needs to happen to get the court ruling that affirms the illegality of targeted assassinations of US citizens?