Posted on 03/12/2012 11:28:44 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Marie Osmond had a bit of an accident on stage during a performance on a Bahamas cruise ship March 2 after an audience member’s question had both her and her brother, Donny, laughing hysterically.
We don’t know what made her laugh so hard, but Marie erupted into such a fit of laughter that she peed on herself and on the stage.
Osmond wasn’t ashamed. Instead, she exclaimed, “I just peed my pants!” and wiped the stage where her little accident took place.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Many men have this problem, it’s called prostate surgery.
Well, there IS only about 10 of us, so really, it’s not a big deal...:)
Back in my cooperate days, I hired her for a performance, and she did a great job. She wasn't cheep, but there were no dramatics either. It was all professional. Our customers loved the show (we got a lot of repeat business after that) and she was very gracious afterword in meeting and talking to people.
I thought she was very professional and worth the money we spent on her. It was a class event.
And I do have a picture of me with her to prove it. ;~))
Baraq hit first. And since he's not my leader I have no problem hitting back.
Lighten up, Francis. If you take everything said in life literally you’re going to strangle yourself in your shoe laces at a young age.
Lighten up, Francis. If you take everything said in life literally you’re going to strangle yourself in your shoe laces at a young age.
Get some original material.
Try to find yourself a living brain.
By the way, can you produce your “mall cop” badge please. I wasn’t aware that the body of FR members had elected you to represent them, and protect their delicate sensitivities.
Women like you are the reason so many people hate working with women.
Somebody wee-wee in your corn flakes this morning??? Your ranting is showcasing your instability.
Where is your “respect for FR members”...hypocrite...? Just here hassling the regulars while taking a break from your day's work on Democrat Underground?
When did Marie Osmond gain protected status? Is it because she is a B rated celebrity? A Mormon? Is it because she sells items on QVC? Is it because she eats Nutrisystem foods? Is it her signature doll collection?
How silly! It’s Marie Osmond, for goodness sakes! Where does this hero worship come from?
That was a bad choice of words by me, wasn’t it? I probably made you thirsty.
I'll bet your coworkers just “love” having you around. Are you single, or have you managed to find someone so desperate and undiscriminating that they're willing to live with you?
That’s what you get for not wearing your magic underwear.
Now - go look in a mirror eastforker. Examine the image closely in respect to the definition you use. Note the striking simularities.
See earlier posts - hypocrisy note.
I kinda think thats what this country was founded on, you know, religious freedom.
And built into that religious freedom is the free exchange of ideas and the free expression of those ideas. Something you seem to have difficulty with eastforker.
So quit being a bigot about others beliefs and concentrate on your own.
Seems you have your own fetish eastforker about trying to silence others who disagree with your worldview - look to your own definition eastforker - that makes you a bigot by your own words.
And by what authority do you claim the right to judge reaganaut? Seems you love to do exactly what you accuse others of doing here eastforker.
You are showing yourself to be an enemy of Jesus Christ by so ardently defending a false religion which claims ALL of Christianity was in total apostasy until a peepstone sexual predator of married women ‘re-establish’ the ‘correct christianity’, which new religion defined God as only a man who had to earn the attributes of godhood and be appointed god over Earth and Jesus as brother of satan and who had to also earn the attributes of godhood ... you are defending that crap in contradiction to what Christianity is founded upon. Now, if you’re not a Christian, I can see why the real Jesus of the Bible would be so easily denegrated by you, but if you claim to be a Christian then perhaps you should learn more about the faux christianity of MormonISM before calling defenders of The Faith ‘bigots’.
What a ridiculous definition.
Let's lay that statement over some groups it might be applied to.
Here are a few:
Nazis?
Child molesters?
Al Qaeda?
This “definition” allows no room for experience and knowledge of groups one might be addressing.
So, the statement concludes that we would somehow be “bigoted” for making conclusions about Nazis without taking time to get to know the individual Nazi(s) of interest?
Please... Apply mature logic to this and throw out the ridiculous and illogical PC and dogma.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.