Can you cite an actual bill number? Because I highly doubt this...
H.R. 347
A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds;You will not be allowed to protest ANYWHERE NEAR where Obama or any official under SS protection is.(B) of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting; or
(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance
GreenLanternCorps, they quoted a bill number and said it passed by “bipartisan” support but I didn’t write the bill number down. I can’t believe that it is not the total discussion on the news at this point. I thank the Lord that other people heard it too because I thought I was stoned out of my mind. Now I have to pick the 3rd world country I am going to move to!
WHOFACTCHECK: New Bill a Protest Clampdown?
By Russ Baker on Mar 8, 2012
Is the president being asked to pound yet another nail into the coffin of democratic expression? So say alarmist scenarios concerning HR 347 (the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011) , now on the presidents desk. [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas (enter "HR347" in search box)
The answer, in short, is maybe. We certainly do have a reason to be concerned. But not necessarily for the reasons we are being given.
http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/03/08/whofactcheck-new-bill-a-protest-clampdown-2/
________________________________________________
H.R.347 Latest Title: Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011
Sponsor: Rep Rooney, Thomas J. [FL-16] (introduced 1/19/2011)
Cosponsors (1)
Related Bills: S.1794
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 112-98 [GPO: Text, PDF]
(enter "HR347" in search box)
House Reports: 112-9