Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane

>>offensive lineman. Not traditionally considered a skill position

I don’t think I could agree with that. The O line is many times more complicated than the D line.


14 posted on 04/05/2012 10:20:19 PM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MarineBrat

“I don’t think I could agree with that. The O line is many times more complicated than the D line”

That may be so. However, “skill positions” are traditionally limited to backs and receivers because they are the ones who move the ball forward. Lineman can be eligible receivers, but not very often.


15 posted on 04/06/2012 1:29:22 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: MarineBrat

The so called “skill positions” are the glory boy spots, aka the big fat paychecks. QB, RB, TE, WR, CB and maybe S. They might or might not actually require more skill than the lines or LBs but that’s the label that got put on those spots decades ago.


17 posted on 04/07/2012 8:18:01 AM PDT by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson