Jeffrey Curley
Posted on 04/09/2012 9:43:18 AM PDT by massmike
Bob Curley’s anguish ought to be matched by public revulsion over the news that one of his boy’s barbaric killers is attempting to get a new trial because he claims the first one was unfair in its portrayal of him.
Charles Jaynes, now 57, contends the judge should not have allowed the jury to hear of his interest in the North American Man/Boy Love Association, even though the apartment where he and his gay lover molested Jeffrey Curley’s dead body was littered with photographs and literature depicting men having sex with young boys.
Do you remember Jeffrey? He was 10, walking home from his grandmother’s house in Cambridge, the day Jaynes and his partner lured him into their car with the promise of $50 and a new bicycle.
When Jeff resisted their advances they suffocated him with a gasoline-soaked rag; after abusing his corpse, they placed it in a plastic trunk which they filled with concrete and lime, sealing it with duct tape before dumping it into the Great Works.
Because we live in Massachusetts, where the courts can be as perverse as the crimes, Bob Curley is right to fear that Jaynes might be set free, which should horrify the rest of us as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
Odd, I don’t recall reading this story in the national media. The one that plays up every offense against homosexuals but none of their dirt.
With so many homosexual reporters in America’s newsroom, certainly it must’ve come across at least one’s desk.
The Lavender Mafia thinks don’t ask don’t tell is bad policy for the military but they’ve said it’s better to remain closeted at work. Why is that? So they can push an agenda without the home audience getting wise as to why certain stories are “newsworthy”?
They were too busy making a folk hero out of Matthew Shepard......
Jeffrey Curley
The story of the teacher at Duke University who pimped out his adopted son didn’t make many waves nationally, either.
This case lead to a death penalty vote in the Massachusetts House that failed by one vote. Even today, if they put the death penalty (or banning gay marriage) to a plebicite in Massachusetts, they would pass easily.
The liberals would not have gay kiddie sex clubs and adult sex activism in the public schools if they were not sympathic to the homosexual rape of boys. Right, Mittens?!
The gay lobby and their liberal pervert cheerleaders wants to progress to make adult sex with children legal. They are sexually grooming and dominating them with their “anti-hate” b.s. right now.
Americans are dumb as a post to allow this in the name of “tolerance.” Disgusting! Why would people be more concerned about the feelings and “pride” of gay men and women the safety and normal development of public school children? Is political correctness worth selling out children like this?
Again, it’s all a matter of politics, when you can get people to think that they have so many boogeymen as their enemies, they are far more willing to buy into your policies. I would be more than willing to bet pride and radicalism, if not liberalism, would be a great deal weaker without loads of distorted stories that come out of the MSM.
“The Lavender Mafia thinks don’t ask don’t tell is bad policy for the military but they’ve said it’s better to remain closeted at work. Why is that? So they can push an agenda without the home audience getting wise as to why certain stories are “newsworthy”?”
The irony is the question of why so many leftists think it’s so bad, that the military can actually strip-search personnel with serious charges and probable cause, while many often leave it up to the right-wing to complain that the security measures at public airports are over the top and only likely to open up terrorism in places other than the airport. It’s all a mystery, but then again, my suspicions are always about the government running identity politics and dividing us into blocs against the real problem of civil rights violations.
Again, it’s all a matter of politics, when you can get people to think that they have so many boogeymen as their enemies, they are far more willing to buy into your policies. I would be more than willing to bet pride and radicalism, if not liberalism, would be a great deal weaker without loads of distorted stories that come out of the MSM.
“The Lavender Mafia thinks don’t ask don’t tell is bad policy for the military but they’ve said it’s better to remain closeted at work. Why is that? So they can push an agenda without the home audience getting wise as to why certain stories are “newsworthy”?”
The irony is the question of why so many leftists think it’s so bad, that the military can actually strip-search personnel with serious charges and probable cause, while many often leave it up to the right-wing to complain that the security measures at public airports are over the top and only likely to open up terrorism in places other than the airport. It’s all a mystery, but then again, my suspicions are always about the government running identity politics and dividing us into blocs against the real problem of civil rights violations.
they both should’ve been tortured to deayh
Bump
The bombers killed eight-year-old Martin Richard.
Charles Jaynes, the monster who killed and sexually assaulted ten-year-old Jeffrey Curley, cried his way to a 2nd degree murder conviction. His partner, Sal Sicari, didn't cry in court and got the maximum penalty of life in prison for 1st degree murder.
The Tsarnaev mother was on the news this morning crying about what America did to her sons. Won't that taint the jury pool for Dzhokhar? His jury will not be impartial if they've been tainted (i.e., manipulated to be sympathetic with his mother) by the media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.