Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vicar7

Yes we are still losing the war...on the face of it. But the Axis margin is much thinner than most people, including Axis leaders, realize.

In preparation for this coming June’s event in the Central Pacific, I am re-reading Paschall & Tully’s “Shattered Sword, The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway.” At this time the Japanese are making their next set of plans, and Yamamoto is obsessed with bringing American fleet carriers out to the “decisive battle.” Paschall & Tully have pointed out that at this time, the Japanese margin of superiority in the war is really just two ships: Shokaku & Zuikaku, the two fleet carriers of Carrier Division 5. The Japanese won’t get another fleet carrier until Taiho is completed in 1944, but they know America is building at least 11 Essex class carriers right now. The fleet striking force of Kido Butai’s six carriers is Japan’s one and only strategic weapons system, and it’s numerical superiority will end in no more than two years. If that force is lost earlier, the Japanese will have lost their naval superiority which they can never again regain.

You’d think they would appreciate stuff like this....


11 posted on 04/13/2012 5:40:42 AM PDT by henkster (Wanted: Politicians willing to say "No" to people. No experience required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
Better to fight a battle now (early 1942), when the Japanese Navy is at its strongest vis-a-vis the U.S. Navy, rather than wait for the United States economic power to kick in. By bad luck and bad planning the Japanese Navy got shattered at Midway, instead of some battle in late 1943 to early 1944.

Of course an even better idea would have been to not start the war in the Pacific at all. But the Japanese politicians at the top had already foreclosed that option.

18 posted on 04/13/2012 6:55:31 AM PDT by Cheburashka (It's legal to be out at night in spacesuits, even carrying a rag dolly. Cops hauled us in anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

I guess it is not always how many things you can break but how fast you can replace what is broke and have more breakers or weapons. The Allies were able to out produce there enemies while becoming very proficient at breaking things including their enemies will.


25 posted on 04/14/2012 6:17:12 AM PDT by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

Btw I really do appreciate Homer’s post find them very interesting even important. I look forward to them daily and search when I miss them.


26 posted on 04/14/2012 6:40:03 AM PDT by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson