Under Sandra Fluke's Logic, Secret Service Agents' Condoms Should Be Reimbursable

Free Republic -- Vanity (American In Tokyo) ^ | 23 April 2012 | AmericanInTokyo

[AmericanInTokyo]

Ms. Sandra Fluke is attached to an organization with high moral values, that places an emphasis on ethics, honesty and integrity. There is in fact not only a student code at Georgetown University, there also an ETHOS CODE , and there is also the history, tradition and mission statement of the Catholic university guiding certain behaviors (both on and off campus as stated and each student is to be aware of this).

It is this very essence and aspect of core institutional values which "15-Minutes-of-Fame Sandra" very publicly whined about, mocked and assailed on national TV and also asserted that the US Government (and by extension, you and I out of our pockebooks and purses) should pick up the cost to facilitate her and others' pecadilloes and daliances...all at the cost of the taxpayer.

[AmericanInTokyo]

Now we have Secret Service in a country where their reported (alleged) acts in-contry were not illegal. According to the understanding of a senior US Sentator, there is no standing statue (yet) forbidding S.S. agents against having a female in their room overnight, and to my knowledge, they were at the time doing advance work in Cartagena, Colombia and specifically on private duty in the evening.

It is reported some of the agents made a stop to the store for "condoms" after they had selected their Colombiana partner for the night. Which begs the question and maybe Ms. Sandra Fluke of Georgetown Law School can weigh in.

If any of these men kept a receipt for the purchase of such "ahem!", items, should they not be able to then submit them in their expense report and demand reimbursement by the US government or the insurance agenc they are covered by as US employees?

After all, the items were needed for not only their peace of mind but protection, just the same as the federally funded insurance covered condoms insisted by Ms. Fluke when she spoke as a member of a traditional, moral academic organization.

Now if she says yes, would not that be something? But if she says no, then she is a hypocrite. Is she not a sexist (and also discriminating based on "sexual orientation", also against the Georgetown ethos, because the agents reportedly had a sexual orientation propensity, at least at that time, to have sexual relations as part of a business deal rather than anything romantic)? She is saying she can have such items funded because she is female (even if such items go against the moral foundation of the institution), but the others cannot have them funded because they are male? I don't get it. Which way is it, Miss FLUKE!!?? Shouldn't these men turn the receipts for contraceptives in to the US Government for reimbursement, if they wished to?

[fish hawk]

So, slut was the right word after all.

[AmericanInTokyo]

Rush Limbaugh called a spade, a spade. And apparantly he is now doing OK and not suffering the consequences. It backfired on the libs.

Truly I would like to hear them, the know-it-all- libs, address this proposition.

[leprechaun9]

Secretary of State “Tools of the Trade”!

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

Why do we hold the security detail to higher standards than those displayed by a former client (William Jefferson Clinton)?

[AmericanInTokyo]

Request to Conservative bloggers:As always, feel free to use this, but a) attribute "Free Republic" and "AmericanInTokyo" (in other words, it is not your own work as you know); and b) provide a URL link to the original thought piece here at FR. Feel free to viralize.

[AmericanInTokyo]

That is another excellent angle yes, R_A_R_H. As they say “s>>>” rolls down hill. These guys are expendible in the eyes of the Powers that Be. I also find Hillary Clinton’s clear public “fraternization” in Cartagena with female deputies (subordinates) as being highly questionable, and might be some violation of State Department policy somewhere.

[umgud]

I just blasted off a link to this to my email list as a “must read.”

[chuckee]

Don’t look for Sandra Fluke to weigh in on the Secret Service controversy. She is too busy dumpster diving for trojans between classes right now.Poor thing.

[KJC1]

Before this "goes viral" you might want to correct some typos. Like these three in one single sentence early on: " in-contry were not illegal. According to the understanding of a senior US Sentator, there is no standing statue..."

I agree with your message, but you might want to clean it up before offering it up as some type of "viral" message!

[AmericanInTokyo]

Boy, you ain’t kidding. Too late now......oh well, that will give it a “signature” at least! ;-)

[AmericanInTokyo]

HaHA! Sandra Fluke. The Gift to Conservatives; The Gift that keeps on Giving.

[jaz.357]

Spot on!

[AmericanInTokyo]

Thank YOU! Sorry for the various typos. It was a rushed job. Speaking of Rush (or Glen or Mark for that matter) I would love for one of them to parody this angle on Monday.....

[chuckee]

Yup, Sandra gives new meaning to the term Rubbermaid.

[al baby]

Looked ok to me

[AmericanInTokyo]

There MUST be a “Sandra Fluke Joke” website somewhere. If not, you are tempting me to start one. Of all the deserving libs to get one, Sandra.....

[immadashell]

Boy, you ain’t kidding. Too late now......oh well, that will give it a “signature” at least! ;-)

The FR Spell checker would have caught two out of three.

[Don@VB]

No need to haggle with Hooker’s. Its free under Obamacare. No co -pay either.

[ModelBreaker]

Nah. That would be “men’s rights.” Can’t be havin’ any of that around Sandra.