Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spin: NARAL dubs parental consent abortion bill the ‘Arrest Grandma’ act
Life News ^ | 4/24/2012 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 04/24/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT by Morgana

WASHINGTON, April 24, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The nation’s top abortion lobby has attacked a federal bill that would ban secret abortions on minors whisked across state lines to avoid parental consent or notification laws, nicknaming it the “arrest grandma” act.

The abortion group slammed the measure for preventing “loving” relatives other than a girl’s parents, or a “member of the clergy,” from helping girls get interstate abortions.

The Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (CIANA), H.R. 2299, would make it illegal to transport a minor across a state line in circumvention of a state law requiring parental involvement. It mandates that abortionists comply with parental consent laws in the minor’s home state, by giving notice or obtaining consent for the abortion from the minor’s parents.

CIANA passed the House Judiciary Committee last month.

In an email Tuesday, NARAL leader Nancy Keenan urged supporters to urge House leaders to vote against the “arrest grandma” act, and questioned, “Shouldn’t a teen in this situation get all the family and community support that she needs – especially if she chooses abortion?”

“Isn’t this what ‘family values’ is all about?” she asked.

Parental notification laws for minors obtaining abortions are among the most popular pro-life laws in America, with national opinion polls finding 70% in favor. Over 30 U.S. states have enacted such laws. By way of comparison, in states where minors can obtain an abortion without parental consent, almost all require the consent of a parent or legal guardian for the same minor to receive a tattoo.

Parental consent laws are typically billed as a way to protect underage girls from being taken advantage of by sexual predators, who otherwise would be able to bring their underage victim in for a secret abortion to hide their crime in the case of pregnancy.

In opening remarks at CIANA’s markup last month, Rep. Trent Franks (R-TX) said the widespread enactment of such laws has “made it clear thorugh leg that parents have a right to know whether their daughters are trying to undergo abortions.”

“Parents play a critical role in the well being of their daughter, particularly in the abortion context,” he said.

Teresa Collett, a Professor of Law at University of St. Thomas School of Law, recently observed, “There is no other elective surgery that minors can obtain while keeping their parents in the dark, and the controversy surrounding this Act shows just how severely the judicial creation of abortion rights has distorted American law.”


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: abortion; prolife

1 posted on 04/24/2012 5:24:17 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

“or a “member of the clergy,” from helping girls get interstate abortions. “

Clergy?


2 posted on 04/24/2012 5:26:08 PM PDT by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I dubbed NARAL the lesbian, baby killers a long time ago.


3 posted on 04/24/2012 5:28:23 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (It's time for the 47% to start paying their "fair share" of income taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’m OK with arresting any grandmother who takes a granddaughter for an abortion.


4 posted on 04/24/2012 5:28:50 PM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That’s like saying that only a Pizza Hut employee may approve a Dominos order. You know what the answer is gonna be.


5 posted on 04/24/2012 5:30:27 PM PDT by christx30 (Freedom above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Arrest Grandma Act. Arrest Married 40-Year Old Boyfriend who got a 14 year old pregnant Act.
6 posted on 04/24/2012 5:40:25 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Clergy?

Why "clergy" IDK but the fact is there are many so-called "clergy" who see no problem with helping a teenager kill her child. The Epsicopal Church eg deems "abortion is a blessing."

7 posted on 04/24/2012 5:53:11 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Clergy?

Why "clergy" IDK but the fact is there are many so-called "clergy" who see no problem with helping a teenager kill her child. The Episcopal Church eg deems "abortion is a blessing."

8 posted on 04/24/2012 5:53:26 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“or a “member of the clergy,” from helping girls get interstate abortions. “

Clergy?

Reverend Cool from the Church of What’s Happen Now


9 posted on 04/24/2012 5:58:38 PM PDT by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“Why “clergy” IDK but the fact is there are many so-called “clergy” who see no problem with helping a teenager kill her child. The Epsicopal Church eg deems “abortion is a blessing.” “

I had posted some “pro life” flyers in a local Episcopal church. The flyers were about a Women’s center that was an alternative to abortion. One lady said I could not post those because “this church does not support or condone abortion” Although she went out of her way to tell me she was not a church member just helped out in the food bank. I had forgotten about that Episcopal Priestess and her “abortion” sermon. I have come to the conclusion that the local Episcopal church is NOT a church but a social services organization.


10 posted on 04/24/2012 6:11:51 PM PDT by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
“Why “clergy” IDK but the fact is there are many so-called “clergy” who see no problem with helping a teenager kill her child. The Epsicopal Church eg deems “abortion is a blessing.” “

I did that quote wrong..... they said “they neither support or condemn abortions" They don't take a stand on it in other words...

11 posted on 04/24/2012 6:13:48 PM PDT by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
About 8 years ago our 15 year old foster child got pregnant. We suspected something early on, but she denied it. We talked to the boy's father who talked to the boy and the truth came out. When we asked her why she denied something that would be evident soon enough she said they had an appointment for an abortion so that no one would find out. California doesn't require any parental consent. But after the truth came out, we asked her what she really wanted to do and she said she wanted to keep the baby, she was just scared, but we were supportive and since then we've adopted her and our grandson just turned 8 three weeks ago. He is a joy and I couldn't love him more.

It makes me wonder how many other scared, irrational girls make bad decisions they later regret, when if they just talked to their parents they might find out that there are alternatives and the parents are not going to disown them. I am in favor of parental notification requirements.

12 posted on 04/24/2012 6:23:58 PM PDT by Teotwawki (To Him be the glory throughout all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
“or a “member of the clergy,” from helping girls get interstate abortions. “

Clergy?

*************************************************

You're forgetting the source... you can self proclaim that you are a wiccan or a "universalist" / "spiritual humanist" ... become clergy here ==> http://www.spiritualhumanism.org/


13 posted on 04/24/2012 6:56:00 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Well if parents are going to be held legally responsible for their kids when they break the law, then they are legally responsible for them ALL THE TIME. Nobody else can do something to their kids if they don’t want it done.


14 posted on 04/24/2012 7:11:10 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Click the link. The Republic you save may be your own.

15 posted on 04/24/2012 7:23:36 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Teotwawki
I am in favor of parental notification requirements.

Should be parental consent. And there should be father-of-the-baby consent requirements also.

16 posted on 04/25/2012 12:33:30 AM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DNA.2012
>”And there should be father-of-the-baby consent requirements also”<

Most of the “Fathers” are Adult Men who want the underage girl to get an Abortion without the Parent's knowledge.

It eliminates the “Statutory Rape” problem, if you know what I mean.

17 posted on 04/25/2012 12:55:29 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson