Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian
I think it depends upon the woman. And also, how many. If it's all women in charge, there's something wrong with the men of a society.

The book of Isaiah was written almost 3000 years ago, so it's nothing new.

3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Sounds a lot like now, as the school systems and CPS try to put children in charge of their parents. And, part of the Strong's Concordance definition of the word "women" in this verse is "adulteress", so we're talking unseemly women. I'm guessing more like the Pelosi/Hillary types, not the Thatcher/Meir types.

77 posted on 05/12/2012 11:43:21 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FlyVet

Yes, it is the men that are the problem really. If they were were just halfway strong with the ladies then we would be much more in God’s order of happiness. The women are filling a very real void and any discussion of or blaming of women without including this is indeed misogynistic and hurting the conservative cause.


81 posted on 05/12/2012 12:32:07 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson