Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

—However the catalyst could be used for the reaction running the other way, converting the hydrogen and oxygen back to water, and electricity.—

I just assumed that would be a peripheral function of the motor in the first place, much as a car’s motor runs the alternator.

The reason I called it similar to perpetual motion is that I would think that the hydrogen and oxygen could be converted from water vapor to water with a simple condensation coil and the electricity could be generated by the engine with, well, an alternator.

The impact is that it produces more energy than it takes in and I assume the magic happens in the catalist, producing more hydrogen/oxigen for combustion and power generation than it needs for the chemical reaction in the first place.


57 posted on 05/14/2012 9:55:07 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf
The impact is that it produces more energy than it takes in

The is the assumption, not the reality.

Catalyst only reduces the energy required for the chemical reaction to produce hydrogen and oxygen from water. It does not reverse or eliminate the need for input energy. The system is still a net loss, or rather electricity is converted to heat in the process.

TANSTAAFL

60 posted on 05/14/2012 10:38:39 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson