Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police dog mauls Wal-Mart worker
AJC ^ | June 8, 2012 | David Ibata

Posted on 06/09/2012 3:06:10 AM PDT by Daffynition

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: andyk

Nah, police dogs have their role and it is a necessary role. They do good work and I don’t hear near as many problems with police dogs as with police themselves.

Police dogs can do this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGQWskxxLV0

Trying to outrun a police dog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TwHQbvyx5c&feature=related

Tackled by dog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI54e7ekwHU&feature=fvwrel

Another nice tackle

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRVM8Hz8Vzo&feature=related

Disarmed by rover

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYErjneazQw&feature=related


41 posted on 06/09/2012 8:51:24 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

About my only complaint with police dogs is with the handlers. They seem to get off on seeing the dogs yanking on perps too long, or maybe they think they need to reward the dogs with a little play time. I don’t know. It seems they really take their time calling off the dog. Of course the dogs in some of these videos aren’t keen to break off their attack but in others, the cops really give the dog a good long play time, longer than seems necessary once the perp has submitted. That’s gotta hurt.

Now ask me if I have any sympathy for the perps?


42 posted on 06/09/2012 8:54:31 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

He would have had more holes in him than a piece of Swiss chese.


43 posted on 06/09/2012 9:16:49 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Cops shoot dog not bothering them, or while trespassing on citizens’ property, no problem.

If this guy would have shot this police dog attacking him, he’d be up on murdering an officer charges.


44 posted on 06/09/2012 9:40:22 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nobamanomore
Dieke’s clothes were ripped, and he sustained deep bites to his stomach, chest, arm and groin.

That dog REALLY likes to play...
45 posted on 06/09/2012 10:56:54 AM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared....for what's coming AFTER America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
This was at 2 am !
46 posted on 06/09/2012 11:47:03 AM PDT by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Yep.


47 posted on 06/09/2012 11:50:29 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Aged golden retriever belonging to a non-cop private citizen?

Clearly a dangerous threat to an officer. Must be shot on sight if it so much as looks at an officer.

Loose police dog which attacks a civilian?

Well, golly gee, these things happen. Oopsie. Our bad. Don’t shoot Rex, unless you want to be imprisoned for murdering a police officer.


48 posted on 06/09/2012 11:56:00 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

When someone - or an article - states that the gun “accidentally went off”, I ask them how often do their hooked-up power tools suddenly start running. Deer-in-headlights response and an awkward silence.

On some of those, the trigger pull is heavier than a handgun.


49 posted on 06/09/2012 12:02:59 PM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

That’s how they play, play kinda rough! I’ve had plenty of clothes ripped, bites (accidental) while training. That said, if the attack WAS unprovoked (which we don’t know) then the dog meets the definition of a vicious dog.

If the guy was taunting the dog, in the dog’s face, we don’t know what went on, just that the dog got out, the guy got bit. It is pretty unusual for a trained dog to target anything except arms and legs. If I were a betting man, I’d bet the stomach, chest, groin were scratches, since from the picture the dog has a classic upper arm hold, often they will brace against your body with their front feet, rip the heck out of your clothes, that’s why you wear a scratch suit or Carhartt overalls. I realize the article says deep bites, but this is a journalist whose experience with protection dogs is about as deep as his experience with firearms, and we know what kind of idiotic references they make to various weapons.

The dog was drug inside while maintaining his grip on the upper arm, which is just as the training dictates. They don’t let go till the ‘out’ command is given, so I don’t believe he would bite in the stomach and let go. It’s not in their DNA or training.


50 posted on 06/09/2012 12:10:58 PM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Perhaps someone can explain to me how a *cop* gets to leave a dog in a parked car in the summer? I’d, rightly, be arrested for animal cruelty.

I've seen it plenty of times, and the first time I saw it, I asked about it. They leave the car running with the AC blasting.

Mark

51 posted on 06/09/2012 12:26:08 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

I love that, will try to remember to use it in the future.

ND - ND - ND!


52 posted on 06/09/2012 12:38:09 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Okay. I don’t believe you should be apprehended by something with which you cannot communicate, and you think it’s okay. We disagree.


53 posted on 06/09/2012 12:53:40 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; Altariel

We find this in the news, too often, of late. :(


54 posted on 06/09/2012 1:12:31 PM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: eccentric

Used to be, the graveyard shift was boring.


55 posted on 06/09/2012 1:14:01 PM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
What?! The police didn’t shoot the dog??

They 'Serve and Protect' .. their own.
56 posted on 06/10/2012 3:26:04 PM PDT by DivineMomentsOfTruth ("Give me Liberty or I'll stand up and get it for myself!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Source link swiped the Disney font.


57 posted on 06/10/2012 4:28:02 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

“How do they train police dogs to not notice the pattern that most perps needing take down are black?”

Interesting observation.


58 posted on 06/10/2012 4:31:50 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Yep, though unfortunately, we have allowed a double standard to develop.

If a cop shoots a law-abiding conservative’s dog, the cop clearly feared for its life.

If a law-abiding conservative shoots a loose officer’s dog attacking his family, friends or own dog on his property, that’s murder of a police officer.

If a cop shoots a police dog?

Well, the department has lost an “asset” (apparently it’s only a “police officer” if a non-cop kills it).

You or I would be in jail charged with “cop killing” if we had shot the same dog for an unprovoked attack.

Oakland County K9 officer shoots police dog after it attacked him

http://www.freep.com/article/20120607/NEWS03/120607076/Oakland-County-K9-officer-shoots-police-dog-after-it-attacked-him


59 posted on 06/11/2012 8:46:50 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson