Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: savagesusie

There’s also this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_States_of_America

Constitutional Originalists are right about 2nd amendment. But probably wrong about the First.

If we can’t bring back dueling, can we at least reverse “Sulivan v. New York Times?”


5 posted on 06/15/2012 3:14:29 PM PDT by I Shall Endure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: I Shall Endure

Good points. I am for bringing back dueling-—and re-establishing true manhood —men who fight to the death for the sake of honor. We had freedom of speech then—which had dire consequences for lying and libel. There always should be dire consequences for lying-—especially in the press. People like Dan Rather and Cronkite should have been strung up and all their wealth taken away and handed out to the military families. Justice is crucial in a “free” society and intentionally lying to the public to affect politics should be treasonous.


6 posted on 06/15/2012 6:50:33 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson