Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John Semmens

It’s Romney’s team MO to attack Sarah with anonymous sources which they have done before so the burden of proof should be on Romney and his people to prove this wrong since they have used this tactic since 2008 in attacking and sabotaging Sarah even when she was on the ticket which we got legit reporters saying it was so


55 posted on 06/19/2012 5:52:30 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Bigtigermike

That would only make sense if Palin was perceived as a threat to Romney—like before she opted out of the presidential race in 2011. At this point that cannot be the case. There would be no point to Romney dissing Palin and angering her supporters.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. As long as that person remains anonymous the claim is, in my opinion, suspect.


78 posted on 06/19/2012 11:39:41 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson