I disagree with this assumption. Sandusky was forced against his will to retire in 1999. I believe the 1998 occurrence was the reason.
As far as the boy in the shower, I'm very aware that this boy was never found. My question is , didn't Paterno wonder why Sandusky was walking about free? Didn't he have any curiosity regarding the investigation? Or was reporting the incidence enough for him? I'm sure if he had any interest in this young boy's well being he could have asked the Penn campus police what was going on and they would have told the great Joe Parterno anything he wanted to know.
js retired after Joe told him he’d never be the HC because he spent too much time with his charity. This was documented in numerous books. I think this was even confirmed by one of the victims in pre-trial testimony.
If you have proof that js was forced to retire to cover up a horrible sex scandal, you should come forward. Now!
If not, then maybe you shouldn’t believe everything you hear.