So? Do you think I said in anything I wrote that they did do anything about it?
You are posting comments about things that were never said and that have little to do with anything I've posted here.
And Whitlock's conclusions are nonsense, or maybe you think most men would be more sympathetic with a male child molester than with the victims, or that men who were aware of such criminal behavior would "think with the wrong head" when considering an adult male who had molested male children.
They were at Penn St.
Ah but you did. You also posted "Most normal men will not be more sympathetic with a molester than with a child victim." But the men who knew about this, and there were many, did nothing about it. Whether it was from sympathy, preserving the program, or some other reason, apparently those reasons were more important to them than the boys who were being abused. And if you read the op-ed, then you saw that it was WOMEN who finally took action. Those are the FACTS.
And Whitlock's conclusions are nonsense, or maybe you think most men would be more sympathetic with a male child molester than with the victims, or that men who were aware of such criminal behavior would "think with the wrong head" when considering an adult male who had molested male children.
Whitlock has his opinions, which there is evidence to support. As I posted to you last time and you seem to take as an attack, "That they didn't (take action) and why is worth discussing, even if you don't agree with this writer's conclusions.".