Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

Here’s my confusion. If I’m in a situation where it is fine to talk to a companion who is physically present with me, why would anyone presume to object if I talk to that person on the phone? I don’t shout into a phone so my voice volume is unchanged. It seems people are looking for a reason to complain.


4 posted on 07/14/2012 12:05:48 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Legalize Freedom!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods

Because that person is *not* physical present - and others are.

There’s a difference.


6 posted on 07/14/2012 3:56:06 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

Although not specifically mentioned in these “commandments” I agree with your objection. I’ve never understood why it’s become “discourteous” to carry on a conversation on the phone in public (when only strangers are one’s “company”), especially the growing trend among business owners to demand their customers not talk on a phone while shopping and/or paying for a purchase.

A business owner has the right to demand that of course, but it has no basis in rational thought. I’m “sorry” such people demand my full attention at the cash register, but trust me, I am fully capable of making a purchase and talking on a phone at the same time, just as if my friend on the phone were physically present with me.

It’s as you said: it’s as if some are just looking for something to complain about.


15 posted on 07/15/2012 9:32:48 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson