1 posted on
07/14/2012 9:40:32 PM PDT by
george76
To: george76
With 350-400 species of shark...do we really need to spend tax money protecting the 4 that are most responsible for attacks on humans?
2 posted on
07/14/2012 9:59:38 PM PDT by
icwhatudo
(This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
To: george76
A GW attacked a kayaker a few hundred yards from where I was surfing last weekend.
They can fillet em all for all I care. Miserable beasts.
3 posted on
07/14/2012 10:56:21 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: george76
The fact that after eating half of the man, the shark returned to eat the rest kind of disputes the “humans are yucky to sharks and they only take a taste.”
Honestly, I don’t think it’s that they don’t like the taste (do sharks have taste buds?) it’s that they are not used to attacking things that fight back. A shark takes a bite out of your leg, you start punching, kicking and fighting, it takes it by surprise and leaves the person alone. Unless you are a great white named Brutus, I guess.
5 posted on
07/15/2012 2:18:44 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: george76
"Y'all know me. Know how I earn a livin'. I'll catch this bird for ya, but it ain't gonna be easy... Bad fish. It's not like going down to pond chasin' blue gills or tommy cots. This shark - swallow ya hole. L'il shakin', l'il tenderizin', down ya go."
6 posted on
07/15/2012 4:58:50 AM PDT by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson