Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ecliptic; ml/nj; rmlew; Yaelle; Salem; Zionist Conspirator; Sarah Barracuda; pabianice; ...
Don’t you think the US did this to emphasize the difference between us and them?

I don't know what the motivation was. There wasn't much "political correctness" at the time. But I certainly don't think honoring the deceased German Nazi (or Japanese, for that matter) military personnel was appropriate at all. They were, after all, an enemy fighting to destroy the US as Americans knew it.

There should have been some established rules for the American military to deal with such situations, and they shouldn't have gone anywhere near this far in their respect for the enemy deceased. After all, if these Germans (or Japanese) had been captured alive, they would be, at the least, in prison for the duration of the war.

From reading about WWII and chatting with my late father, a WWII veteran, I can sense that just about all the top military brass in the US armed services would probably have become enraged if something like this had happened under their command.

13 posted on 07/23/2012 7:25:26 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93
But I certainly don't think honoring the deceased German Nazi (or Japanese, for that matter) military personnel was appropriate at all.

Such treatment of enemy dead certainly helped keep the Germans from getting suspicious when the U-505 failed to return from patrol.

19 posted on 07/24/2012 8:53:16 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson