...but he ain't a freakin' muslim hell bent on allowing the muslim brotherhood to have a party with our necks, our women, our children et.al. Anyone who thinks different is just, well....nevermind. Decorum forbids that here.
Posted on 07/27/2012 3:37:16 PM PDT by Signalman
“I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.”
- Mitt Romney, 1994, former Boy Scouts of America National Executive Board member”
Yes, that’s a bad quote. And I don’t agree with much of what Romney supports, but I don’t agree with 99.9% of the things that Obama supports. I can give you quotes to make your blood curl from Obama. So, let’s get the guy out of office and deal with Romney from the Senate and Congress.
You'd be very popular on a parole board. ;-)
Uh huh, and how about the leader you’re about to vote for:
Mitt Romney, 1994, former Boy Scouts of America National Executive Board member, ready to sell boys down the river.
Please explain how this position is any different from the ABOs "If you don't vote for Romney you're really an Obama supporter".
Thanks.
By not voting for him /johnny ... you did vote for all those things. Many of us don’t like Romney ... but let’s stop with the theatrics and use our heads. Don’t vote for Romney if you don’t want to, vote AGAINST Obama.
...but he ain't a freakin' muslim hell bent on allowing the muslim brotherhood to have a party with our necks, our women, our children et.al. Anyone who thinks different is just, well....nevermind. Decorum forbids that here.
He never slipped up and talked about his muslim faith in front of Jorge Stepapoopalous, did he?
Just like Penn State.
I’m not going to do what is wrong.
This IS a conservative forum, after all.
/johnny
Just think of all the great things President Romney will be able to push through a GOP controlled Congress.
I’m sure he, Boehnor, McConnell, McCain, and Graham can come up with some great legislation. Maybe they can rehash some of Romney’s old Mass favorites like Romneycare, gay marriage, weapons bans, or cap & trade.
Perhaps Senator Rubio could lead the “comprehensive” immigration reform.
Having Romney with a rubber stamp spineless GOP congress sounds like a great idea. I wouldn’t want those in the GOP dominated Congress of 2012 to have to be in the position of opposing the Democrats and Obama. Sometimes that makes for awkward moments at the cocktail parties.
Instead, I have opted to use my head and my principles.
Perhaps, you are different, as you appear to have a shortage of both.
I'm not a newb. I don't listen to what they say. I watch what they do.
/johnny
No way, no how! Romney is a pale Obama. The GOP screwed real Conservatives over for the last time.
“Wait for those “jeaniouses” to come to provide an explanation on how staying home and NOT voting is in no way a vote for the purple lipped prince...
I saw one even try to break it out with math.”
Simple, a vote against Obama and Mittens is a vote against socialism and evil.
“HE’S NOT OSAMA OBAMA!”
There it is..and AMEN
Wait for those “jeaniouses” to come to provide an explanation on how staying home and NOT voting is in no way a vote for the purple lipped prince...
- - - - -
I don’t know a single person who is planning on staying home and not voting.
We will vote, just not for Obama or Romney. There are conservatives running and we should be backing them rather than dating our rapist (the GOP).
Choosing “the lesser of two evils” is STILL CHOOSING EVIL.
Gotta go-—don’t want to miss my enema...
Reason 1 is enough.
“You need to update your understanding of Romney’s position on the issues.: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/
He has stated a conservative position. Obama has demonstrated the opposite and wants four more years to compete the job he has started.
You’all need to get off your high horse and take pity on yourselves and your children.”
You’re first mistake was going to his website. Before he came out for amnesty, it sure as hell wasn’t on his website. Remember how he was bashing Newt for wanting amnesty? How he was all in favor of Arizona’s immigration law? And then, suddenly, he says later he didn’t mean he was in favor of Arizona’s law but only one aspect of it, and now he wants amnesty for young illegal aliens? You should consider all his public positions as “suggestions” until he comes out with a position before or after he is elected. And even then, it’s subject to change, though it can only get more liberal as time goes on.
Just like Obama.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.