Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Orders Oracle to Continue Release and Support Software for Intel Itanium-Based Servers.
xbitlabs.com ^ | 08/01/2012 09:31 PM | Anton Shilov

Posted on 08/07/2012 11:54:36 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Judge Rules in Favour of HP in Litigation with Oracle Concerning Support of Itanium Software

A California state judge ruled on Wednesday that Oracle will have to continue supporting and releasing new versions of its software designed for Intel Itanium-based servers sold by Hewlett-Packard. The judge said that an agreement between HP and Oracle regarding release of software compatible with Itanium did exist and that Oracle is obliged to follow it. The latter will appeal the decision.

"Today’s proposed ruling is a tremendous win for HP and its customers. The superior court of the state of California, Santa Clara County, has confirmed the existence of a contract between HP and Oracle that requires Oracle to port its software products to HP’s Itanium-based servers. We expect Oracle to comply with its contractual obligation as ordered by the court," a statement by HP claims.

On Wednesday, the court revealed that the settlement and release agreement entered into by HP, Oracle and Mark Hurd (ex-CEO of HP and the president of Oracle now) on September 20, 2010, requires Oracle to continue to offer its product suite on HP’s Itanium-based server platforms and does not confer on Oracle the discretion to decide whether to do so or not. The terms “product suite” means Oracle software products that were offered on HP’s Itanium-based servers at the time Oracle signed the September 20, 2010 agreement, including any new releases, versions or updates of those products.

(Excerpt) Read more at xbitlabs.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: oracle

1 posted on 08/07/2012 11:54:45 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Karma from Peoplesoft?


2 posted on 08/07/2012 11:57:40 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Oh well, so the Court can force Oracle to port its software.
Can the Court also force Oracle to make sure its software runs fast on Itanium?
3 posted on 08/07/2012 12:03:39 PM PDT by ken in texas (I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas

Depends on the terms of the contract, doesn’t it? If Oracle obligated themselves to support, then I have no problem forcing them to meet their obligations.


4 posted on 08/07/2012 12:06:51 PM PDT by kevkrom (Those in a rush to trample the Constitution seem to forget that it is the source of their authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Oracle should have signed a "living contract" rather than that dead, old paper one.
5 posted on 08/07/2012 12:36:14 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Recycled Olympic tagline Shut up, Bob Costas. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Agree, but with all the mergers these days it's hard to keep track.

- Oracle used to try to run on every platform available.
- Oracle purchased Sun (and may now have a favored platform).
- HP kicked Mark Hurd out and he got a job at Oracle.
- Oracle tried to drop support for an HP platform.
- HP's forcing Oracle to continue support.

Sounds more like a soap opera.

6 posted on 08/07/2012 12:51:18 PM PDT by ken in texas (I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They had to be force to keep MYSQL running. Oracle is getting too big powerful.


7 posted on 08/07/2012 1:45:15 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson